Skip to main content

We shall be at Web Summit Lisbon 2026—9–12 Nov—ALPHA.

Where to meet me
All case studies

Case study

My tenant was disputing the service charge — and I had to be exactly right.

Property ownerMixed-useA few propertiesPhase 1 · live

In short

A mixed-use owner faced a tenant disputing the service charge line by line. Hobson read the leases, deeds of variation and letters, found the exact percentages, the earlier settlement and the consultation requirement, and set out an answer to every challenge — evidence the owner could stand behind.

A hands-on owner of a handful of mixed-use properties. They know their buildings — but the precise percentages and clauses live scattered across leases, deeds of variation and letters.

The moment

A commercial tenant had started treating the service charge like a menu — paying some items, refusing others, and asking, line by line, what exactly is this for? One recurring charge they said they'd never understood. Another they insisted a signed settlement years earlier had already taken off. A large roof-and-structural bill they argued had only grown because the work was left too long. And they'd raised statute — a consultation requirement — and asked why there were no comparison quotes, and whether costs from the wider building were even theirs to share.

Every point needed a precise, evidenced answer, pulled from the right place: this clause of the lease, that deed of variation, the earlier settlement, the trail of correspondence. Concede the wrong item and it comes straight off the bill; misread a clause and the whole position wobbles. So the owner was going back and forth across documents to answer each challenge accurately enough to hold the line — fairly, but firmly — because nearly right is no good when a tenant is questioning every figure.

What Hobson does today

Hobson has read the whole document set — lease, deeds of variation, the earlier settlement, the correspondence — and resolves it to the current position. So the owner can answer each challenge from the right source: is this item recoverable under the lease? did a variation or a past settlement change it? does this clause even apply to this unit? — with the exact wording and the document behind every point.

A disputed figure comes back as it currently stands — the amount as varied, the clause it rests on, both documents cited — ready to put to the tenant and defend, with no doubt about whether a later deed moved it. And it isn't only service charge: current rent, key dates, repair responsibility, what a clause means all come back the same way, with the evidence attached. Point by point, the owner can hold the line — fairly, and without conceding money to uncertainty.

"When a tenant's disputing your service charge, you can't be 'fairly sure'. Now I get the exact figure, the clause it sits in, and the deed that changed it — so I can quote it and stand behind it."
— The owner (anonymised)

Where this is heading

Answering is the foundation, not the finish. What this owner most wants next is a co-worker that stays ahead of them — and that's the direction of travel. By using Phase 1 today, they're helping shape exactly how it behaves.

Phase 1 · live now

Knowing where you stand

Ask questions across all your documents and get straight, sourced answers — the current position, resolved through every variation.

Phase 2 · coming

Staying ahead of it

A co-worker that watches the deadlines and obligations across the portfolio and flags a review, renewal or notice before it falls due — so nothing is ever missed.

Hobson the owl mascot

If this is you — you own a few properties and sometimes have to be exactly right in front of a tenant or adviser, with money riding on the detail — Phase 1 gives you that certainty today, and it's the start of a co-worker built to keep you ahead.